A customer portal instead of status emails
Information, documents, and requests become accessible in one place, reducing friction for both customers and the internal team.
Self-service · Roles & permissions · Integrations
Independent Software Studio · Burg, Germany
HSS / 2026I design and build digital products for companies looking for a direct technical partner – from the first decision to the running system.
Direct contact with the developer. No sales layer, no hand-off chain.
What actually matters
More often, priorities stay vague, progress remains invisible, or technical decisions are never made understandable. That is where the collaboration starts.
Services
Strategy, interface, and engineering are considered together. The result is neither a polished shell without substance nor a clean system nobody enjoys using.
Typical engagements
These examples show typical project types and provide orientation.
Information, documents, and requests become accessible in one place, reducing friction for both customers and the internal team.
Self-service · Roles & permissions · Integrations
A clear workflow replaces manual transfers, duplicate maintenance, and progress that is difficult to trace.
Workflows · Data model · Automation
Requirements become a focused first release – lean enough to launch quickly and stable enough to keep building.
Scoping · UX · MVP · Iteration
Approach
Every phase ends with something visible and a clear decision. You always know what happens next and why.
Goals, users, existing systems, and real constraints are sorted together.
Scope, user journeys, and technical boundaries become concrete before unnecessary complexity emerges.
Implementation happens in visible stages. Feedback arrives while decisions are still inexpensive.
After launch, code, operations, and next steps remain understandable – with or without ongoing support.
Direct responsibility
I am Timo Haseloff and build digital products across the full journey: structure, interface, architecture, and code. Requirements do not pass through sales before reaching a changing delivery team. You speak with the person who frames the decisions and builds the software.
Insights
No trend lists. Concrete perspectives on decisions, technology, and digital products.
All articlesA sober framework for choosing between configuration, integration, and custom development.
How a small first release stays focused without blocking the next stage of development.
Why responsible planning exposes uncertainty instead of hiding it behind one fixed number.
Frequently asked
Websites, web apps, mobile products, and internal systems where product thinking and engineering belong together. An unclear scope or solution is a perfectly normal starting point.
With a no-obligation conversation about the goal, current situation, and constraints. You then receive a clear recommendation for the approach, a sensible first scope, and next steps.
Fixed prices are possible for clearly defined work packages. For products with many open decisions, a staged approach is usually more honest and economical.
The product determines the stack. Common choices include TypeScript, React, Next.js, React Native, Node.js, and PostgreSQL – never for their own sake.
Yes. The existing codebase is reviewed before any commitment. You then get a transparent view of whether continued development, targeted remediation, or a rebuild makes more sense.
Contact
Briefly describe the current situation, the goal, and – if known – the timeframe. You will receive a direct, honest assessment.
Usually answered within one business day.